@bboczeng bboczeng

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

The author is overwhelmingly focused on the AI memory/NAND supercycle, with SNDK as the highest-conviction long and MU as the institutional validation read-through. Their distinctive view is that memory suppliers replace Mag 7 as the AI winners because hyperscaler AI costs, storage bottlenecks, and capex burdens shift profit pools upstream. Late week, they kept pressing SNDK upside targets while also adding put-selling tactics around MU earnings and warning that broad equities/Mag 7 are vulnerable.

Conviction is concentrated in memory, especially SNDK, where the author repeatedly raised or reiterated extreme upside targets and disclosed an all-in position; the theme is intensifying with later calls for 6000, 3000 next week, and put-selling around MU earnings. They are broadly bearish on Mag 7, TSLA, MSFT and SPY because AI capex and Fed risk could compress broad equity leadership, while SPCX flipped from pair-trade short exposure versus Anthropic to speculative call buying as options opened. Pump-risk is highest in SNDK and SPCX due to repeated high-upside targets and options-focused language.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.