@JerryCap JerryCap

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

JerryCap is focused on large-cap AI/platform disruption, with Microsoft framed as vulnerable to OpenAI and Google/Meta discussed around model capability parity. Single-name conviction is most visible in META and GPN, but both are two-sided: META swings from bottom-call jokes to a blunt bearish read and back, while GPN is initially defended as too pessimistically priced before being used as a weak-company comp. No explicit position disclosures or directional trade calls appeared in this window.

No positions disclosed this window — everything below is commentary, not book talk.

The week is dominated by AI platform risk and large-cap model-capability debate, with Microsoft framed bearishly versus OpenAI and Google/Meta treated as closer in capability. META and GPN carry the clearest single-name concentration but both are mixed, with bottom-call language offset by execution concern for META and value defense offset by weak-company comps for GPN. No explicit adds, trims, exits, or CALL_DIRECTIONAL trade actions were present in the supplied signals.

Alignment separates skin-in-the-game from commentary: ✓ = the author discloses a position consistent with their talk; “call (no pos)” = directional call without a disclosed position; “commentary” = opinion only.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.