@MichaelKantro MichaelKantro

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

Kantro is not making single-name calls; the window is a macro and sector-framework tape centered on S&P multiples, Fed/rate risk, and earnings momentum. His distinctive read is that Tech and Energy can remain resilient in rising-rate regimes when earnings growth and oil-hedge traits support them, while SPX outcomes hinge on EPS and multiple sensitivity. No explicit position disclosure, directional trade, or late-week flip appears in the supplied signals.

No positions disclosed this window — everything below is commentary, not book talk.

The author’s concentration sits in macro framework work: SPX multiple sensitivity, Fed/inflation paths, and sector leadership through earnings momentum. There are no CALL_DIRECTIONAL or POSITION_DISCLOSURE signals, so no adds, trims, exits, or explicit flips can be supported. Late-window attention shifts toward Tech and Energy resilience, but the supplied signals show framework emphasis rather than trade execution.

Alignment separates skin-in-the-game from commentary: ✓ = the author discloses a position consistent with their talk; “call (no pos)” = directional call without a disclosed position; “commentary” = opinion only.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.