@optionscjp optionscjp

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

The author is concentrated in NOK, framing it as an AI infrastructure, optics, 6G and robotics compounder while repeatedly adding shares and disclosing large exposure. Around that core, they are trading QCOM, ENPH, TE, HIMS and AMKR, reporting positive AI hardware and storage catalysts but warning against chasing crowded memory names. Late in the window the macro tone turned more cautious on the unsigned Iran deal, while ticker conviction stayed concentrated in NOK and selected AI infrastructure names.

Conviction intensified in NOK through repeated adds, explicit high-conviction disclosures, and a 25% portfolio-size statement, creating the clearest concentration and pump-risk flag. He remained bullish on QCOM, selected solar names, HIMS and AMKR, while trimming HIMS and using options premium strategies across holdings. Macro tone flipped from deal-driven bullishness early in the window to more cautious by June 21 as the Iran deal appeared unsigned, but ticker-level risk appetite stayed high.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.