Author

@rev_cap rev_cap

Macro framework thinker pushing a structural-inflation, wealth-effect economy thesis

Builds and debates a top-down macro model of inflation, Fed

trader score
-0.09
hit rate
40%
mean α
-0.08%
signals 14d
55

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 10 scored bets: 40% hit rate, -0.08% mean alpha, trader score -0.09. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +1.3% since posting (mean over 1 mentions with price data).

Recent signals15receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-08-28·@rev_cap·Author argues AI's labor-displacement addressable market is much smaller than commonly claimed.·
2026-08-28·@rev_cap·Labor shortages are presented as evidence against the prevailing AI-displacement narrative.·
2026-08-28·@rev_cap·A 20% equity decline is expected to reduce AI, neocloud, hyperscaler and SpaceX spending.·
2026-08-27·@rev_cap·Author argues the Fed selectively emphasizes inflation measures that imply convergence to 2%.·
2026-08-27·@rev_cap·Author says Taylor Rule models imply 5–6% rates and criticizes Powell and Warsh for favoring easier policy.·
2026-08-27·@rev_cap·Expects Jackson Hole to be uneventful and Warsh to prioritize balance-sheet reduction while delaying action.·
2026-08-26·@rev_cap·Argues earnings strength persists because policy and economic drivers have not changed.·
2026-08-25·@rev_cap·Skeptically frames AI's huge TAM, labor claims, deflationary effects, and required capex as contradictory.·
2026-08-25·@rev_cap·Sarcastically criticizes an inert Fed response to falling unemployment and rising inflation.·
2026-08-25·@rev_cap·Argues policymakers must confront inflation, defense costs and budget constraints to avoid pain.·
2026-08-25·@rev_cap·Criticizes policymakers for supporting stocks and stimulus rather than accepting a corrective decline.·
2026-08-25·@rev_cap·Expects persistent inflation and high borrowing costs because policymakers avoid spending cuts.·
2026-08-24·@rev_cap·Argues the unusually narrow advance is now reversing in the same concentrated fashion.·
2026-08-24·@rev_cap·Expects years of incoherent policy between aggressive easing and Volcker-style inflation control.·
2026-08-24·@rev_cap·Characterizes inflation as structural rather than temporary.·

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.