Ticker brief
LFLR
last close
·
1 day
·
14 days
·
mkt cap
·
signals 14d
7
authors 14d
1
crowd 14d
+0.35
No price history on file for this name (likely non-equity or unlisted) — the “since then” column below stays blank.
Sentiment — last 14 days
daily mean sentiment, 2026-08-17 → 2026-08-27 · now +0.35 (−1 bearish … +1 bullish)
Who spoke1
| author | grade | trader score | signals | mean sent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @AGORACOM | C | +1.24 | 7 | +0.34 |
Recent signals7of 7 in 14d — receipts included
| date (PT) | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-27 | @AGORACOM | +0.35 | Argues nearby rail and a 60-km project-to-mill corridor support LaFleur's potential operating economics. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-26 | @AGORACOM | +0.40 | Argues LaFleur's connected deposit, processing, and transport setup stands out with gold above $4,600. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-25 | @AGORACOM | +0.35 | Highlights a permitted mill about 60 km from LaFleur's deposit as a development advantage. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-24 | @AGORACOM | +0.40 | Compares projected production cost with the PEA gold-price case and current gold prices. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-20 | @AGORACOM | +0.30 | Highlights existing processing, rail and logistics infrastructure around the gold project. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-18 | @AGORACOM | +0.25 | Sponsored post highlights existing mill and transport infrastructure supporting the project. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-17 | @AGORACOM | +0.30 | Compares estimated ore transport costs of C$15 per tonne by truck versus C$5 by rail over roughly 60 km. | · | tweet ↗ |
“Since then” = price move from the close on the signal's date (PT) to the latest close — what happened after they said it, not a backtest. A — means no trading session has closed since the signal yet. Sentiment is our extracted per-tweet score, −1…+1.