Author
@_Shark_Trading
grade Cx.com/_Shark_Trading ↗
The account is market/trading-oriented, with futures-trading promotion and posts mentioning stocks/indexes like $NVDA, $PLTR, $NFLX, and $SPX, but I found no verifiable institution
trader score
+0.40
hit rate
35%
mean α
+0.06%
signals 14d
29
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 20 scored bets: 35% hit rate, +0.06% mean alpha, trader score +0.40. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -0.6% since posting (mean over 22 mentions with price data).
Recent signals15receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-24 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.30 | Says NQ/QQQ trade is bagged and tagged, implying completed gains. | +0.3% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-24 | IWM | @_Shark_Trading | +0.00 | References internals and market breadth chart for QQQ, SPY, and IWM. | +0.3% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-24 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.00 | References internals and market breadth chart for QQQ, SPY, and IWM. | +0.3% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-24 | SPY | @_Shark_Trading | +0.00 | References internals and market breadth chart for QQQ, SPY, and IWM. | +1.6% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-24 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | -0.55 | If looking short, look at tech — Says SPY is stronger than QQQ and recommends tech for shorts. | +0.3% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-24 | SPY | @_Shark_Trading | +0.10 | If looking short, look at tech — Says SPY is stronger than QQQ and recommends tech for shorts. | +1.6% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | SPY | @_Shark_Trading | +0.00 | Shares day trading levels being watched for the rest of the week. | +1.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.00 | Mentions equity curve after start of week with QQQ/NQ chart. | -0.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | · | @_Shark_Trading | · | Quotes monetary policy destroying currency and middle class, a broad macro-bearish view. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.40 | You’re welcome phrasing implies a prior QQQ/NQ call played out. | -0.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.35 | Suggests a NQ target zone of 29615-620 while tagging QQQ. | -0.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.40 | Bang Bang with NQ/QQQ implies a completed intraday move. | -0.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | QQQ | @_Shark_Trading | +0.35 | Suggests NQ 29800 as a level while tagging QQQ. | -0.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-22 | SPCX | @_Shark_Trading | -0.65 | Reports trade up about 50% while bearish on SPCX valuation. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-22 | SNK | @_Shark_Trading | +0.40 | Reports trade up about 50% while bearish on SPCX valuation. | · | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.