Author
@alphaticaio alphaticaio
grade Bx.com/alphaticaio ↗
Quant market-structure analyst fusing dealer-gamma, macro frameworks, and base-rate studies
Publishes dense intraday-to-swing market-structure analysis
trader score
+1.81
hit rate
50%
mean α
+0.23%
signals 14d
349
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 20 scored bets: 50% hit rate, +0.23% mean alpha, trader score +1.81. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -1.6% since posting (mean over 317 mentions with price data).
Recent signals15receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | SOXX | @alphaticaio | -0.15 | Historical sample shows slight additional late-day weakness after 2.5% intraday declines. | -3.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SOXX | @alphaticaio | -0.15 | Reports concentrated same-day $530 put positioning while declining to trade it. | -3.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPY | @alphaticaio | -0.10 | Charm favors 765 while negative vanna and rising IV favor 760. | -0.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPY | @alphaticaio | -0.40 | Negative gamma, bearish flow and IV frame 760 as pivotal support with downside to 755-750. | -0.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | QQQ | @alphaticaio | -0.25 | Negative gamma, bearish flow and IV frame 760 as pivotal support with downside to 755-750. | -0.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SOXX | @alphaticaio | +0.00 | References historical episodes and forward returns contained in unseen media. | -3.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPY | @alphaticaio | +0.05 | October monthly OPEX historically averages +0.07% with a 61-65% up rate. | -0.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | NVDA | @alphaticaio | -0.35 | Argues institutional capital is rotating away from technology into defensive consumer names. | -1.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | QQQ | @alphaticaio | -0.30 | Argues institutional capital is rotating away from technology into defensive consumer names. | -0.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | IWM | @alphaticaio | -0.05 | OPEX positioning makes 772-773 resistance and 765 max pain the key conditional levels. | +2.0% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPY | @alphaticaio | -0.10 | OPEX positioning makes 772-773 resistance and 765 max pain the key conditional levels. | -0.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | QQQ | @alphaticaio | -0.05 | OPEX positioning makes 772-773 resistance and 765 max pain the key conditional levels. | -0.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | · | @alphaticaio | · | Says broad indiscriminate selling is needed to restore price distortion. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPX | @alphaticaio | -0.10 | Post-OPEX gamma improved, but SPX remains below the 7765 flip with downside exposure. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPY | @alphaticaio | -0.10 | Post-OPEX gamma improved, but SPX remains below the 7765 flip with downside exposure. | -0.4% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.