@artemis artemis

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

Artemis is mostly focused on SPCX as synthetic SpaceX exposure, including one explicit buy call alongside repeated liquidity, follow-through, and repricing observations. The distinctive read is that SPCX may be forcing broader SpaceX-linked repricing, though the author also flags valuation and unlock overhangs. Secondary attention sits in HOOD’s margin improvement and prediction-market volume growth, with NVDA framed mainly as a mindshare leader.

SPCX conviction intensified across the window: early price-performance posts became an explicit buy call on 2026-06-16, followed by open-interest and sector repricing arguments. The same SPCX cluster also contains valuation and unlock caution, so the theme is mixed despite the directional buy. No adds, trims, exits, or position disclosures were present; concentration risk is high because SPCX accounts for the majority of ticker-linked signals.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.