Author

@EricJhonsa EricJhonsa

Sell-side-caliber semis analyst mapping AI-infra demand to silicon winners

Publishes original, valuation-grounded fundamental analysis

trader score
-0.29
hit rate
45%
mean α
-0.21%
signals 14d
30

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 20 scored bets: 45% hit rate, -0.21% mean alpha, trader score -0.29. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +0.9% since posting (mean over 12 mentions with price data).

Recent signals15receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-08-28·@EricJhonsa·Argues AI competition may disrupt several software markets, with ERP and security relatively insulated.·
2026-08-28CRM@EricJhonsa-0.25Sees AI-related competition and margin threats for Salesforce despite Agentforce momentum and prior oversold conditions.
2026-08-27·@EricJhonsa·Argues a mini-bubble has formed in security software despite some AI-related revenue benefit.·
2026-08-27·@EricJhonsa·Says software risk-reward has worsened as stronger workflow-capable LLMs may arrive within months.·
2026-08-27·@EricJhonsa·Calls price action in some SaaS stocks questionable due to chasing and short-covering.·
2026-08-27·@EricJhonsa·Expects broad semiconductor infrastructure growth across memory, equipment, optics, CPUs, foundries and power semis.·
2026-08-26·@EricJhonsa·Argues the AI-market party is unlikely to end at current valuations while end demand remains untapped.·
2026-08-26NVDA@EricJhonsa+0.60Cites Nvidia's 70% FY2028 growth guide and argues deceleration concerns are premature without weaker demand.+3.8%
2026-08-26·@EricJhonsa·Expects agentic-workload growth to delay an AI-sector correction until at least 2028 absent major efficiency gains.·
2026-08-26NVDA@EricJhonsa+0.60Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.+3.8%
2026-08-26TSM@EricJhonsa+0.55Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.-0.0%
2026-08-26MKSI@EricJhonsa+0.50Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.·
2026-08-26AEIS@EricJhonsa+0.50Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.·
2026-08-26AVGO@EricJhonsa+0.55Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.+3.7%
2026-08-26UCTT@EricJhonsa+0.50Argues positioning, AI advances and valuations make many AI infrastructure names attractive.-4.9%

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.