Author
@FavioSchneeberg FavioSchneeberg
grade Cx.com/FavioSchneeberg ↗
Elliott-Wave chart technician calling Argentine and US-tech levels for a paid room
Posts Elliott Wave / technical level charts with specific en
trader score
-1.71
hit rate
20%
mean α
-1.37%
signals 14d
88
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 20 scored bets: 20% hit rate, -1.37% mean alpha, trader score -1.71. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -2.8% since posting (mean over 40 mentions with price data).
Recent signals15receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | BTCUSDT | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.35 | Bitcoin remains conditionally bullish above 74,967, with confirmation on a break of 87,035. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | XAUUSD | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.15 | Gold's bullish reaction needs confirmation above $4,215-$4,251 and fails below $4,073. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-16 | SPX | @FavioSchneeberg | -0.15 | Fed speakers remain divided, but inflation concern preserves risk of further hikes and pressure on growth stocks. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | · | @FavioSchneeberg | · | Presents a framework for evaluating companies beyond PEG using growth, cash flow, margins and debt. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | · | @FavioSchneeberg | · | Explains that PEG is a screening filter rather than a standalone buy signal. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | · | @FavioSchneeberg | · | Numerical example shows how weaker earnings growth can sharply raise the PEG ratio. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | MU | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.10 | Micron's valuation appears low versus expected growth, but memory cyclicality warrants caution. | -5.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | · | @FavioSchneeberg | · | Explains that low PEG ratios depend on valuation, expected EPS growth and growth sustainability. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | BLDR | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | +5.9% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | HBAN | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | · | @FavioSchneeberg | · | Defines PEG interpretation thresholds while warning that a low PEG does not ensure cheap valuation. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | DAL | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | -1.7% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | GPN | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | -1.6% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | MU | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | -5.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | FSLR | @FavioSchneeberg | +0.00 | Ranks S&P 500 companies by low PEG ratios; ticker list is capped at six. | -3.8% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.