Author
@iamtomnash iamtomnash
grade Cx.com/iamtomnash ↗
Conviction AI-growth pundit, PLTR superfan preaching quality and patience
Broad-audience commentator/educator pushing a secular AI-inf
trader score
+2.03
hit rate
80%
mean α
+3.74%
signals 14d
3
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 10 scored bets: 80% hit rate, +3.74% mean alpha, trader score +2.03. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +5.9% since posting (mean over 1 mentions with price data).
Recent signals3receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-28 | CRM | @iamtomnash | +0.70 | Claims validation after CRM rose 42% during the past month. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-25 | · | @iamtomnash | · | Argues investors underestimate the magnitude of agentic AI. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-08-24 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.80 | Buy PLTR before a potential 50% jump rather than chasing afterward. — Explicitly says the current setup is where readers should buy PLTR. | +5.9% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.