Author
@iamtomnash iamtomnash
grade Cx.com/iamtomnash ↗
Conviction AI-growth pundit, PLTR superfan preaching quality and patience
Broad-audience commentator/educator pushing a secular AI-inf
trader score
-1.17
hit rate
20%
mean α
-1.18%
signals 14d
7
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 15 scored bets: 20% hit rate, -1.18% mean alpha, trader score -1.17. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +7.8% since posting (mean over 5 mentions with price data).
Recent signals7receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.25 | Minimal PLTR validation post with implied positive stance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-01 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.45 | Says PLTR has a world-class CEO. | +2.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-26 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.75 | doubling down on Palantir recently — Author says he has been doubling down on PLTR because AI competition fears are misunderstood. | +14.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-25 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.20 | Dismisses people gloating over PLTR short-term price swings. | +20.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-19 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.35 | Says PLTR is down 24% YTD but tells holders to relax. | +0.6% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-19 | SPCX | @iamtomnash | +0.15 | Calls SPCX both generational opportunity and overhyped expensive stock. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-19 | PLTR | @iamtomnash | +0.75 | Explicitly says PLTR is extremely undervalued. | +0.6% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.