Author
@JayWoods3 JayWoods3
grade Cx.com/JayWoods3 ↗
Named market pundit posting transparent, tickered technical-level calls across large caps
Real-time technical commentary and chart-based swing calls,
trader score
+1.98
hit rate
69%
mean α
+1.97%
signals 14d
4
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 13 scored bets: 69% hit rate, +1.97% mean alpha, trader score +1.98. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +1.5% since posting (mean over 4 mentions with price data).
Recent signals4receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-22 | PLTR | @JayWoods3 | -0.60 | Calls PLTR a major breakdown despite strong earnings. | +8.2% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-20 | ORCL | @JayWoods3 | -0.15 | Raises concerns on ORCL but highlights NVDA/GOOGL cash flexibility for capital returns and M&A. | -23.9% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-20 | NVDA | @JayWoods3 | +0.30 | Raises concerns on ORCL but highlights NVDA/GOOGL cash flexibility for capital returns and M&A. | -7.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-20 | GOOGL | @JayWoods3 | +0.30 | Raises concerns on ORCL but highlights NVDA/GOOGL cash flexibility for capital returns and M&A. | -2.2% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.