Author
@joceyreyes209 joceyreyes209
grade Cx.com/joceyreyes209 ↗
Named retail analyst with concentrated, reasoned conviction in AI data center cooling
Builds and reiterates fundamental theses on a few small/mid-
trader score
+0.58
hit rate
45%
mean α
+0.70%
signals 14d
5
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 20 scored bets: 45% hit rate, +0.70% mean alpha, trader score +0.58. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -4.4% since posting (mean over 5 mentions with price data).
Recent signals5receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | INV | @joceyreyes209 | +0.45 | Predicts two-phase cooling becomes only viable cooling tech and Accelsius is leader. | -3.8% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-30 | INV | @joceyreyes209 | +0.45 | Disagrees with negative view and cites industry checks supporting Accelsisus engagement. | -4.9% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-26 | ONDS | @joceyreyes209 | +0.70 | Says ONDS bull thesis is strong and valuation cheap given cash/backlog/outlook. | -5.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-23 | EOSE | @joceyreyes209 | -0.75 | Blames EOSE share price action on CEO's unconstructive fireside chat and guidance dodging. | -19.4% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-06-19 | INV | @joceyreyes209 | +0.35 | Brief positive/teasing INV comment but stance is vague. | -27.3% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.