Author

@lokoyacap lokoyacap

Supply-chain-deep AI compute analyst modeling hyperscaler capex and chip financing

Posts original, reasoning-heavy threads on the AI datacenter

trader score
+0.39
hit rate
60%
mean α
+0.51%
signals 14d
5

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 10 scored bets: 60% hit rate, +0.51% mean alpha, trader score +0.39. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +3.4% since posting (mean over 2 mentions with price data).

Recent signals5receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-08-23·@lokoyacap·Questions whether indiscriminate spring buyers are now indiscriminate sellers.·
2026-08-23·@lokoyacap·Argues open-source model token inefficiency may raise cost per task and favor frontier models.·
2026-08-22MSFT@lokoyacap+0.15Argues hyperscaler LTAs reduce classic channel-stuffing risk because customers are closer to end demand.+6.3%
2026-08-22GOOGL@lokoyacap+0.20Argues hyperscaler LTAs reduce classic channel-stuffing risk because customers are closer to end demand.+0.5%
2026-08-22·@lokoyacap·Says hyperscaler LTAs carry less channel and inventory-cycle complexity than analog-vendor distribution.·

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.