Author

@ManchesterUtd81 ManchesterUtd81

Anon energy-refining specialist threading mechanistic oil value-chain analysis with a higher-rates macro view

Posts original, reasoning-heavy threads and replies analyzin

trader score
-0.24
hit rate
60%
mean α
-0.27%
signals 14d
8

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 10 scored bets: 60% hit rate, -0.27% mean alpha, trader score -0.24. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +0.6% since posting (mean over 1 mentions with price data).

Recent signals8receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-07-01XOM@ManchesterUtd81+0.55Will buy XOM shares from confused sellers in a week or two. — Author says they will buy XOM after boomers sell due to confusion over change.+0.6%
2026-06-26·@ManchesterUtd81·Thematic AI-porn adoption view but no public ticker named.·
2026-06-24·@ManchesterUtd81·Bearish opinion on WTI/shale oil demand and refinery fit.·
2026-06-23·@ManchesterUtd81·Comments on AI agents working together in trading-related chat rooms.·
2026-06-23SPCX@ManchesterUtd81-0.55Says bearish calls on SPCX were dismissed but are now being taken seriously.·
2026-06-21·@ManchesterUtd81·Podcast summary suggests forward returns may be better outside tech as AI becomes table stakes.·
2026-06-21·@ManchesterUtd81·Bullish oil-risk stance: winners are betting Hormuz stays closed or traffic stays minimal.·
2026-06-21·@ManchesterUtd81·Expects Gulf Coast rain to cause reported operational impacts for oil/refining.·

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.