trader score
-0.60
hit rate
50%
mean α
-1.18%
signals 14d
37
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 6 scored bets: 50% hit rate, -1.18% mean alpha, trader score -0.60. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +14.1% since posting (mean over 4 mentions with price data).
Recent signals15receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Says existing evidence already warrants more urgent action, but the linked subject is unavailable. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-13 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Frames new AI labs as a key unresolved issue for safety policy, thresholds and industry pacing. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-13 | META | @Miles_Brundage | -0.15 | Author criticizes Meta AI's API for lacking adequate spending-protection features. | -15.7% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-13 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Reports anomalous behavior in how the Argon model separates chain-of-thought from non-chain-of-thought output. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-12 | META | @Miles_Brundage | -0.15 | Reports deployment timeouts in Meta Code and plans to retry later. | -13.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-12 | META | @Miles_Brundage | -0.10 | Suspects Meta's Wonder Full rollout remains incomplete across surfaces. | -13.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-12 | META | @Miles_Brundage | -0.15 | Criticizes limited transparency into model use for Meta's paid AI offering. | -13.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-09 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Reports smooth cross-application collaboration between two AI agents using shared tools and files. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-09 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Argues interoperable cooperation among competing AI systems is underused while noting coordination risks. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-09 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Criticizes all frontier AI companies for lacking a plan for safe self-improvement. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Uses a dismissive metaphor to express skepticism toward the AI industry's claims. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Speculates an unidentified party's action supports an IPO and regulatory-capture strategy. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-07 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Argues superhuman AI will have implications far beyond business software. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-07 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Claims AI timelines are shorter than electoral cycles and superintelligence may precede the next election. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-05 | · | @Miles_Brundage | · | Questions whether weak model results reflect intentional restrictions or unusually high expectations. | · | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.