Author

@Oculustrade Oculustrade

High-volume hype-driven QQQ/NQ level trader pumping an AI-everything macro narrative and a paid app

Posts rapid-fire intraday and swing directional calls on ind

trader score
-0.39
hit rate
35%
mean α
-0.28%
signals 14d
120

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 20 scored bets: 35% hit rate, -0.28% mean alpha, trader score -0.39. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +0.8% since posting (mean over 77 mentions with price data).

Recent signals15receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-07-02SPX@Oculustrade+0.60Reports completed SPX 7460C trade from $115 to $2260, a 1900% gain.·
2026-07-02·@Oculustrade·Says early and late July are in play and shakeout is over, but no ticker named.·
2026-07-01NQ@Oculustrade+0.35Excited reaction to NQ, but no details beyond exclamation.·
2026-07-01NQ@Oculustrade+0.90Explicit forward instruction to long NQ.·
2026-07-01QQQ@Oculustrade+0.60Says author feels bullish and wants SPY around 764 before problems.-1.7%
2026-07-01SPY@Oculustrade+0.70Says author feels bullish and wants SPY around 764 before problems.-0.1%
2026-07-01PLTR@Oculustrade+0.60Reports free options play up 104% today.+2.8%
2026-07-01PLTR@Oculustrade+0.45Reports PLTR up 21% off lows in 6 days.+2.8%
2026-07-01QQQ@Oculustrade+0.65Argues failed bear move makes QQQ more likely to go to 780 than 650.-1.7%
2026-06-30QQQ@Oculustrade+0.05Frames QQQ levels: from 736 could see 780 or 650.-3.2%
2026-06-30QQQ@Oculustrade+0.25Recaps prior warning at 720 and current 735 level.-3.2%
2026-06-30·@Oculustrade·Says absolutely bullish without naming a ticker.·
2026-06-30·@Oculustrade·Says he previously told followers they were bullish; past-tense recap.·
2026-06-29TSLA@Oculustrade+0.55Author recaps a prior Tesla call before its move.-4.5%
2026-06-29QQQ@Oculustrade+0.35Suggests QQQ has no problems until 736, a bullish technical level view.-1.6%

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.