Author
@OddDiligence OddDiligence
grade Ax.com/OddDiligence ↗
Anon forensic diligence trader dissecting SPACs and small-cap scams via filings.
Reads filings and capital structures to build mechanistic di
trader score
+0.07
hit rate
45%
mean α
+0.16%
signals 14d
4
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.
Their picks, scored
Across their last 11 scored bets: 45% hit rate, +0.16% mean alpha, trader score +0.07. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +1.6% since posting (mean over 4 mentions with price data).
Recent signals4receipts included
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | GOOGL | @OddDiligence | +0.00 | Calls Meta's public dispute and deleted post evidence of bubbly corporate behavior. | -9.5% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-13 | META | @OddDiligence | -0.45 | Calls Meta's public dispute and deleted post evidence of bubbly corporate behavior. | -15.7% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | CCXI | @OddDiligence | -0.20 | Expresses skepticism about a CCXI event or invitation, but context is missing. | -7.1% | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | CCXI | @OddDiligence | +0.55 | Nvidia robotics executive's endorsement supports CCXI's mobile robot-safety proposition. | -7.1% | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.