Author

@ondrejslunecko ondrejslunecko

Disciplined earnings-quality grader covering AI/growth names with transparent positions

Reacts to quarterly earnings with line-by-line breakdowns an

trader score
-0.20
hit rate
40%
mean α
-0.14%
signals 14d
6

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 20 scored bets: 40% hit rate, -0.14% mean alpha, trader score -0.20. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -1.7% since posting (mean over 2 mentions with price data).

Recent signals6receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-07-02·@ondrejslunecko·Framework for buying cyclicals/commodities when P/E looks high or earnings are crushed.·
2026-07-02·@ondrejslunecko·Author questions why consumer sentiment is worst in 40 years and says times are great.·
2026-07-02PLTR@ondrejslunecko+0.35Author says rereading PLTR earnings compounds while others debate the Fed.
2026-06-28·@ondrejslunecko·General long-term quality-business buy-and-hold investing stance without tickers.·
2026-06-24CCL@ondrejslunecko-0.55CCL Q2 revenue grew but EPS and operating income fell; author grades execution C.-3.5%
2026-06-24MU@ondrejslunecko+0.90MU Q3 FY2026 metrics are described as parabolic with revenue, margin, net income and EPS surging.-7.0%

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.