@ParadisLabs ParadisLabs
First-principles AI hardware supply-chain stock picker hunting under-followed global chokepoint suppliers
Builds and discloses long, concentrated, multi-year theses o
Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.
Across their last 20 scored bets: 60% hit rate, +1.09% mean alpha, trader score +1.15. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -6.9% since posting (mean over 127 mentions with price data).
ParadisLabs is concentrated in AI infrastructure: memory undersupply, optical/CPO bottlenecks, neocloud compute, and large-cap AI platforms. The distinctive read is that small-cap supply-chain names like NBIS, AAOI, SNDK, AEHR, IQE and SIVE can still 2-3x despite strong moves, while megacap AI remains buyable on forward multiples. Late in the window he added megacap tech and disclosed broad recovery-trade holdings, while trimming risk would come from overextended or weaker-thesis names like ARM.
Conviction is concentrated in AI supply-chain small caps, especially memory, optical/CPO, AEHR, NBIS and related neocloud infrastructure, while megacap AI is still being bought rather than avoided. The clearest late-week actions are explicit adds to NVDA, MSFT, META and AMZN, disclosure of recovery-trade holdings, and a willingness to trim overextended ARM if cash is needed. Pump-risk is highest in repeated 2-3x upside baskets around NBIS, SNDK, AAOI, AEHR, IQE and SIVE, where the author is making high-conviction, high-beta calls after strong moves.
| date (PT) | ticker | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-03 | 6182.TW | @ParadisLabs | +0.35 | Plans to trim some Wafer Works position next week after 5x gain. — Author says 5x is good enough and plans to trim next week while noting pricing power. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | · | @ParadisLabs | · | Author says nothing has changed for concentrated AI holdings despite pain. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | · | @ParadisLabs | · | Says memory fundamentals have not changed despite market selloff. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | · | @ParadisLabs | · | Multi-year AI trade view says high-conviction AI names are to be bought, not sold. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | HOOD | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Calls the Robinhood renaissance one for the ages. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | CRWV | @ParadisLabs | -0.45 | Will take short swing trades in CoreWeave on recovery signs — Author calls CoreWeave low quality and says they will take short swings on recovery signs. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | ORCL | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | META | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | AMZN | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | AVGO | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | MSFT | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | GOOGL | @ParadisLabs | +0.45 | Long AI thesis argues demand remains supply constrained and selloff is a reset before capex guidance. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | NVDA | @ParadisLabs | +0.00 | Frames Ams Osram asset sale as de-risking and AI photonics pivot; mentions listed peers only for context. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | AVGO | @ParadisLabs | +0.00 | Frames Ams Osram asset sale as de-risking and AI photonics pivot; mentions listed peers only for context. | — | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-07-02 | AAPL | @ParadisLabs | +0.00 | Frames Ams Osram asset sale as de-risking and AI photonics pivot; mentions listed peers only for context. | — | tweet ↗ |
Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.