Author

@quantian1 quantian1

Numerate anon skeptic dissecting AI-bubble valuations with base-rate and SOTP math

Posts original valuation and quant base-rate analysis (often

trader score
+0.63
hit rate
67%
mean α
+2.45%
signals 14d
9

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 6 scored bets: 67% hit rate, +2.45% mean alpha, trader score +0.63. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +2.8% since posting (mean over 4 mentions with price data).

Recent signals9receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-10-14CRWV@quantian1+0.35Argues CoreWeave 2031 debt should not trade wider than a peer because it has assets and EBITDA.-17.6%
2026-10-13NVDA@quantian1+0.00Dismisses an unspecified technology as easily reproducible on an RTX 4090.-7.7%
2026-10-13·@quantian1·Mocks failed attempts to support memory stocks after another 6% decline.·
2026-10-12OKLO@quantian1-0.65Calls Oklo weak while citing roughly $5 billion of at-the-market financing as evidence of retail capital access.-18.2%
2026-10-12OKLO@quantian1-0.70Derides the referenced nuclear startup by comparing it unfavorably with already-criticized Oklo.-18.2%
2026-10-11·@quantian1·Argues fragmented industries require profitable or unusually loyal customers, using airlines as the cautionary example.·
2026-10-11·@quantian1·Criticizes replacing an oligopoly with leveraged competitors while end-market pricing collapses.·
2026-10-10·@quantian1·Relays unverified whispers that roughly 40% of investment pods may be fired for underperformance this year.·
2026-10-05·@quantian1·Argues AI agents mainly suit low-stakes menial work and mocks venture-capital enthusiasm.·

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.