Author

@WalterDeemer WalterDeemer

Veteran market technician posting quantified breadth-thrust studies and historical market-cycle analogues

Original technical/quantitative market analysis centered on

trader score
+0.35
hit rate
54%
mean α
+0.11%
signals 14d
8

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Across their last 13 scored bets: 54% hit rate, +0.11% mean alpha, trader score +0.35. Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved +0.8% since posting (mean over 5 mentions with price data).

Recent signals8receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-06-29·@WalterDeemer·Notes morning gaps have already filled, but no ticker or index specified.·
2026-06-28QQQ@WalterDeemer+0.10Cites unfilled SPY and QQQ gap levels as trend-strength reference.+0.9%
2026-06-28SPY@WalterDeemer+0.10Cites unfilled SPY and QQQ gap levels as trend-strength reference.+2.2%
2026-06-26INLF@WalterDeemer+0.00Notes INLF trading 2 billion shares already.·
2026-06-25ADXT@WalterDeemer-0.35Says prior 4-5B share days in ADXT were not bullish.·
2026-06-25QQQ@WalterDeemer+0.00QQQ gap at 734.39 remains unfilled.-0.5%
2026-06-23QQQ@WalterDeemer+0.05Gives downside gap-fill levels for SPY and QQQ as trend strength tests.-0.1%
2026-06-23SPY@WalterDeemer+0.05Gives downside gap-fill levels for SPY and QQQ as trend strength tests.+1.5%

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.