Author

@BobLoukas

A large-audience position trader and cycle analyst with a paid market intelligence service covering equities, gold, oil, USD and crypto cycles, so his posts are directly market-rel

trader score
·
hit rate
·
mean α
·
signals 14d
10

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY.

Their picks, scored

Not yet in the scored-bets universe (fewer than 20 scoreable calls). Their last-14d mentions, direction-adjusted, have moved -6.8% since posting (mean over 1 mentions with price data).

Recent signals10receipts included
date (PT)tickerauthorsentwhat they saidsince thenreceipt
2026-08-22·@BobLoukas·Author says he bought the current bottom and is far from sidelined.·
2026-08-22MSTR@BobLoukas-0.80Calls MSTR's decisions disastrous and notes its 40% decline versus Bitcoin's 3% decline.+6.8%
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas+0.00Calls MSTR's decisions disastrous and notes its 40% decline versus Bitcoin's 3% decline.·
2026-08-22·@BobLoukas·States that a market cycle can end through time and sentiment without a new price low.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas-0.25Expects a possible retest of the lower-$60,000 range to complete Bitcoin's cycle through time.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas-0.20Frames the open question as whether Bitcoin has experienced a mild bear market by its historical standards.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas+0.70Reports loading spot in the low $60,000s and closing a long swing from $64,000 to $78,000.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas+0.55Might buy a Bitcoin retest of the low-$60,000 range. — Expresses prospective intent to buy Bitcoin if it retests the low-$60,000 area.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas-0.15Says the move sets up a possible Bitcoin retest in the low-to-mid $60,000s.·
2026-08-22BTC@BobLoukas+0.55Calls Bitcoin's rebound bullish and identifies $74,000 and $82,800 closes as cycle-confirmation levels.·

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.