@cperruna cperruna

Grade = how their written analysis reads (A best). Trader score = how their last-20 timestamped calls performed vs SPY. · Analyst brief as of 2026-06-22.

cperruna is mostly chart- and valuation-driven this week: holding RDDT, disclosing an underwater ELF position, and repeatedly flagging TTD as a severe laggard still trapped in stage 4. The distinctive read is less sector-specific and more process-oriented: avoid overvalued broken leaders, respect the 200d moving average, and favor names building bases. No explicit directional trade calls or news breaks appeared in the payload.

The author is concentrated on chart discipline: bearish on broken stage 4 growth leaders like TTD and ADBE while still holding RDDT and ELF. There are no explicit adds, trims, exits, or CALL_DIRECTIONAL trades in the payload, so position activity is limited to disclosed holds or unclear status updates. Pump-risk is most relevant around repeated RDDT position attention and repeated TTD downside focus, though signal count is small.

Grade is our human read-worthiness rating; trader score is a rolling 20-bet hit-rate/alpha composite — different things, often disagreeing. “Since then” is direction-unaware in the table; the summary line above adjusts for which way they leaned.