Ticker brief
SPHB
last close
·
1 day
·
14 days
·
mkt cap
·
signals 14d
5
authors 14d
4
crowd 14d
-0.9σ
No price history on file for this name (likely non-equity or unlisted) — the “since then” column below stays blank.
Sentiment — last 14 days
daily mean sentiment, 2026-10-05 → 2026-10-16 · now -0.35 (−1 bearish … +1 bullish)
Who spoke4
| author | grade | trader score | signals | mean sent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @cfromhertz | B | -0.96 | 2 | -0.30 |
| @Paul_Schatz | C | +1.08 | 1 | +0.70 |
| @davevermilion | A | -0.54 | 1 | -0.15 |
| @JP_Money_95630 | B | -1.32 | 1 | -0.55 |
Recent signals5of 5 in 14d — receipts included
| date (PT) | author | sent | what they said | since then | receipt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-16 | @cfromhertz | -0.35 | Argues rising bonds drive rotation from overcrowded growth toward low-volatility dividend stocks. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-15 | @cfromhertz | -0.25 | Argues interest rates, not true risk appetite, caused high-beta strength versus defensive sectors. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | @JP_Money_95630 | -0.55 | Weak high-beta technicals and macro risks are cited as reasons for caution and potential algorithmic selling. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-08 | @davevermilion | -0.15 | Flags a possible mean-reversion setup in the SPLV-versus-SPHB relative spread. | · | tweet ↗ |
| 2026-10-05 | @Paul_Schatz | +0.70 | Discloses purchases in six named assets; additional sales are omitted due to the six-ticker cap. | · | tweet ↗ |
“Since then” = price move from the close on the signal's date (PT) to the latest close — what happened after they said it, not a backtest. A — means no trading session has closed since the signal yet. Sentiment is our extracted per-tweet score, −1…+1.